Survey Software Best Practices

Entries from April 2007

Survey Software Highlights MultiTasking College Students

April 25, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Of those polled, 84 percent of students reported that they regularly use their cell phones for sending and receiving text messages. Of those who text, 70 percent admitted to text messaging while in class.

In a generation of technology and information, students have the ability to engage in constant communication with others, but this practice may actually harm their education, according to a recent poll.

The informal survey conducted around the Fresno State campus revealed some prevalent issues regarding students’ usage of text messaging. It looked at the frequency of text messaging by students and their attitudes about its effects in the classroom.

“This is a multi-tasking generation and many people think they’re not being distracted,” said Dr. Tamyra Pierce, a Fresno State associate professor of mass communication and journalism.

The survey, which was distributed to Fresno State students of ranging class levels, looked at their regular use of text messaging. In particular, it focused on the frequency of text messaging while in class.

Of those polled, 84 percent of students reported that they regularly use their cell phones for sending and receiving text messages. Of those who text, 70 percent admitted to text messaging while in class.

“I’m not at all surprised by this,” Pierce said. “I see it all the time.”

Pierce, who has conducted formal surveys of her own regarding the use of text messaging and MySpace among high school students, said 47 to 49 percent of students text message and 10 percent admitted to text messaging during an exam.

The real question: Is this frequent text messaging harmful to students’ educations? The informal campus poll revealed that 64 percent of students believe that text messaging in class draws their attention away from lectures.

“Several semesters ago I had to go to a ‘no cell phones in sight’ policy because it just got out of control,” Pierce said. “Students think they can do it all and they won’t be distracted, but I think they are.”

Many students, however, say that their studies are not affected by their texting habits.

Fresno State junior Amy Munson admits to texting on a daily basis.

“I actually have a Sidekick and a cell phone for texting and I’m on them all the time,” said Munson, a communication major.

“Honestly, I text to stay awake in class,” Munson said. “As long as I’m constantly doing something, then I won’t completely zone out on what the teacher’s saying. It almost helps me listen because at least I’m getting bits and pieces.”

Fresno State senior Martin Campanella believes the prevalence of text messaging also depends on the type of classes students are in.

“I’m an engineering major,” Campanella said. “It’s mostly guys in my classes, so you don’t see it as much. I think girls text a lot more. It is like they can’t wait to talk about all this stuff.”

Kevin Tague, a third-year health science major, said he rarely text messages but it still affects his concentration.

“You hear it all the time,” Tague said. “Even when phones are on vibrate it gets annoying.”

But this scattered concentration and distraction is what Pierce warns students about.

“You get so engrossed in it and sure you may only miss this much, but that small amount may be what’s on the exam,” Pierce said.
While Pierce has enacted a no cell phone policy in her class, many teachers have yet to go that far. Munson said some teachers do get more of her attention than others.

“If someone’s just standing there for an hour talking, guaranteed half the class isn’t going to hear a thing,” Munson said. “I definitely get more involved when there’s interaction in group work and then I won’t text.”

LINK TO FULL ARTICLE

Categories: survey software

CHECKBOX 4.1 Survey Software Released by Prezza Technologies

April 12, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Release Notes
New Features

Active Directory Integration:
Prior to this release, network authentication for the CHECKBOX application was done through an IIS configuration. With 4.1, CHECKBOX will now directly authenticate Active Directory users. When network login is enabled, a user will be able to browse to the login page and enter his/her active directory user credentials and login in to the application without having to specify a new set of credentials specific to CHECKBOX.

URL Rewriting:
URL Rewriting will allow survey administrators to provide access to surveys via a more”friendly” url. Currently, survey URLs have a form that is extremely long:

(http://mysurveys.com/checkbox/Survey.aspx?s=f3cf6c7c18a94dca9a4f5918823ed686).

Long URLs have three major drawbacks:

1. They are not easy to remember.

2. They arepotentially intimidating and could reduce response rates.

3. When put into some emailclients, the strong can wrap and break the link.

Our new URL rewriting feature will solve these three problems.

CAPTCHA item type:

CHECKBOX 4.1 will include a CAPTCHA item type. CAPTCHA stands for “CompletelyAutomated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart. When used, this item type will prevent computer “bots” from finding and populating CHECKBOX surveys with false or spammy responses. This automated means of determining if a respondent is human is required to increase the security of our web-based application.

Resolved Issues

• Report images are now cached in the database to prevent issues with web farms.
• Auto-login for network users should now work properly for default.aspx.
• The USERNAMENOTUNIQUE error that occurred when updating network users has been resolved.
• Fixed issue where “Automatically Log User In” option for invitations did not work.
• Fixed install issue that caused Windows or FreeForm connection string options to not update configuration files correctly.
• Changed default log file location to c:\temp\CheckboxExceptionLog.txt from
c:\temp\ExceptionLog.txt.
• Average Score ItemEditor Score Option is now correct
• Email response item now allows delimited email address list
• Cross tabs report items calculate percentages correctly
• Added report filter documentation to the help system
• Can now delete incomplete responses
• Welcome text properly aligned for users with only report viewer permissions

Categories: CHECKBOX survey software · Prezza · attitudinal data · checkbox · consumer reports · crm · definitions · destination crm · interesting survey results · longitudinal survey · online survey software · prezza technologies · survey results US · survey results international · survey software · web survey software

2 Quick Ways to Implement Email Triggered Feedback with CHECKBOX®

April 6, 2007 · Leave a Comment

 

A relatively new feature in CHECKBOX® is the ability to send an email message as part of a survey. When the Email Message item is used correctly, organizations can automatically deliver data collected from within a survey so that companies can act upon that information faster. In the same respect, companies can use this email trigger feature to send information directly to the survey respondent in order to deliver something appropriate – a coupon, an incentive for completing the survey, or a link to where they can find more related information.

While the usefulness of sending incentives might be debatable, the ability for a survey to autorespond in several different ways is an interesting way to filter and deliver a specific target audience with the right information.

 

Categories: attitudinal data · checkbox · consumer reports · crm · definitions · destination crm · interesting survey results · longitudinal survey · online survey software · prezza technologies · survey results US · survey results international

According to a recent survey, 37 percent of drivers ages 18-27 say they text behind the wheel.

April 2, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Text messaging isn’t illegal while driving in Maryland, but drivers stand the chance to get slapped with a hefty fine for being reckless.

Jessica Kartilija reports in this age of recent technology, people are text paging, talking on their cell phones and using their blackberry, and it can be extremely dangerous.

According to a recent survey, 37 percent of drivers ages 18-27 say they text behind the wheel.

Ragina Averella, from AAA says, “It’s unfortunate, but distracted driving impacts all of us, particularly dangerous to teen drivers, because they are already new, and they don’t have the cognitive abilities to deal with the driving and other factors.”

The survey found that the numbers of people texting while they drive, drops to 17 percent among drivers ages 29 to 44.

Only two percent of drivers ages 45 to 60 admitted to texting behind the wheel.

Lindsey Smawley, annoyed by texters says, “It drives me nuts, because they are not paying attention at all, they’re like this instead of looking at the road.”

While it isn’t illegal to text message or talk on the phone here in Maryland, an officer who can tell that you are obviously distracted behind the wheel could pull you over and slap you with a fine for negligent driving. The offense will cost up to $140.

The fine is even steeper if the distracted driver gets into an accident.

Several states are considering a law that will ban drivers from text messaging while they drive. A similar proposal here in Maryland did not pass.

Just south of us, in Washington D.C. drivers are required to use a head set or ear-piece, if they want to talk on their cell phones.

LINK TO FULL ARTICLE 

Categories: interesting survey results